Home / Glossary / Queer
Queer
Also written: Queer, Queer people
self-id-requiredslur-reclaimedumbrella-termevolving-usage
At a glance
Source-by-source
“Queer is an acceptable in-group term but it is often better to refer to queer communities rather than calling an individual queer unless they have already told you this is how they identify.”
SumOfUs treats queer as a valid in-group term and an acceptable umbrella for the broader LGBTQ community, but draws a careful line at applying it to individuals: prefer 'queer communities' to 'a queer person' unless the individual has self-identified that way. The guide's central principles name queer as an acceptable in-group identifier.
“If someone identifies as 'queer' — an identity that has been reclaimed by LGBTQI communities to elevate it from its previous status as a slur — referring to them as a 'self-identified queer activist' would make it clear that this person chooses to be identified this way.”
Sierra Club uses 'queer' as the worked example for how to handle self-identified language under their broader self-id rule: the 'self-identified queer activist' construction explicitly signals that the term comes from the subject, not the writer. The guide acknowledges 'queer' has been reclaimed but doesn't treat it as a default writer-applied term.
“Traditionally a pejorative term, queer has been appropriated by some LGBT people as a self-affirming umbrella term. However, it is not universally accepted even within the LGBT community and should be avoided unless describing someone who self-identifies that way or in a direct quote.”
DSG names both the reclamation and the in-community dissent: queer is now an affirming umbrella for some, but not universally accepted within LGBT communities, so the operative rule is to use it only when the subject self-identifies or in a direct quote. The entry treats queer as carrying both meanings simultaneously rather than declaring the reclamation complete.
“This term was previously used as a slur, but has been reclaimed by many parts of the LGBTQ+ movement.”
HRC treats queer as a present-tense reclaimed umbrella term that includes both sexual orientation and gender-expansive identities. The entry names the slur history but presents the reclamation as a settled fact within much of the LGBTQ+ movement, without the cautionary frame that DSG and NLGJA pair theirs with.
“Originally a pejorative substitute for gay, now reclaimed by some LGBTQ+ people. Use with caution; still offensive when used as an epithet and might be offensive to many LGBTQ+ people regardless of intent. Consider your audience before using queer; explain its meaning if needed.”
NLGJA's 2025 stylebook treats the reclamation as partial: queer is acceptable when subjects use it for themselves, but still offensive as an epithet and potentially offensive to many LGBTQ+ readers regardless of intent. The guide flags both umbrella and individual uses, recommends audience awareness, and notes some straight people who identify with LGBTQ+ culture call themselves 'culturally queer.'
Synthesis
Queer is the most contested term in this chapter, and the corpus reflects that contest rather than resolving it. The guides that give a use-rule converge on self-identification: use queer when the subject identifies that way (DSG adds the direct-quotation case explicitly). Sierra Club’s “self-identified queer activist” construction is the cleanest model — explicitly signaling that the term comes from the subject, not the writer. SumOfUs adds a related caution: prefer “queer communities” over “a queer person” unless the individual has stated the identifier. HRC’s glossary describes the reclamation without prescribing a use-rule. Across the guides that prescribe one, queer is not a writer-applied default.
Where sources diverge sharply is on how settled the reclamation is. HRC’s 2023 glossary treats the reclamation as a present-tense fact within “many parts of the LGBTQ+ movement” — the slur history appears, but as history, not as a current cautionary frame. DSG’s entry, by contrast, names ongoing dissent inside the community: queer “is not universally accepted even within the LGBT community” and “should be avoided unless describing someone who self-identifies that way or in a direct quote.” NLGJA’s 2025 stylebook lands closest to DSG: “Use with caution; still offensive when used as an epithet and might be offensive to many LGBTQ+ people regardless of intent.” Both DSG and NLGJA hold the partial-reclamation frame; HRC treats it as settled. SumOfUs and Sierra Club sit between — accepting the in-community use without making strong claims about completion.
Generational and contextual splits matter most here. Queer reads differently to a 25-year-old and a 65-year-old within the same LGBTQ+ community. Younger LGBTQ+ people more commonly use queer as a primary identifier, including straight-presenting people with non-binary identities or “culturally queer” affinity (NLGJA names this as an active usage). Older LGBTQ+ readers who lived through queer as a slur in active hostile use may still hear it that way regardless of intent. NLGJA’s “consider your audience before using queer; explain its meaning if needed” is the operational rule for journalism and external-facing copy. The community-internal use (movement publications, LGBTQ+-led organizations) is much wider.
The corpus is clear on what queer is not: a fully neutralized synonym for gay or LGBTQ+. The reclamation is real and the term is in active affirming use; the slur history is also real and the in-community dissent is real. Treating queer as a settled default obscures both halves of the truth.
Audience notes
- Journalists and editors. Use queer only when the subject self-identifies that way or in a direct quote. Sierra Club’s “self-identified queer activist” construction is the safest model for general audiences. NLGJA’s audience-awareness check applies: if you’re writing for a mixed-generation audience, consider whether the readers may experience the term differently — and explain it briefly if the context warrants.
- Headlines and umbrella references. “LGBTQ+ community” or “LGBTQ community” carry the umbrella more universally than “queer community.” Use queer as an umbrella only when the audience accepts the reclaimed sense (movement publications, LGBTQ+-led organizations, community-internal copy) — not as a default for general news copy.
- Generational read. Younger LGBTQ+ people more commonly use queer as a primary identifier and as a comfortable umbrella; older LGBTQ+ readers who experienced queer as an active slur may still hear it that way regardless of intent. Don’t assume a single read; ask when you can.
- The “culturally queer” question. NLGJA notes some straight people who identify with LGBTQ+ culture call themselves “culturally queer.” This usage is contested even within LGBTQ+ communities. When a subject uses the term for themselves, follow self-ID; when uncertain, don’t apply it from outside.
Related terms