Home / A–Z / BIPOC
BIPOC
BUY-pock (single word, not letter-by-letter)
Also written: B.I.P.O.C., Black, Indigenous, and People of Color
contested-termuse-with-careumbrella-termevolving-usagepost-2020-shift
At a glance
Source-by-source
“A preferred term today is 'BIPOC' referring to Black, Indigenous and people of color, which provides a unifying term for ease of use while still acknowledging the reality that Black and Indigenous people in the United States are impacted by structural and individual racism in a different way than other people of color. Either term, PoC or BIPOC, is acceptable for use at the Sierra Club, but be sure to explain the meaning of BIPOC the first time you use it in each piece of content. Overall, we should strive to be more specific whenever possible. If you really mean to refer to Black communities, or Indigenous communities, then do so. Using BIPOC as a catch-all for all racial identities aside from white risks erasing the very real differences in lived experience among people of different races, undermining the original purpose of the term.”
Sierra Club accepts both BIPOC and PoC, requires explaining the BIPOC acronym on first use per piece, and stacks two competing pressures: BIPOC is preferred over PoC for naming the specific structural distinction Black and Indigenous people face, but using a more specific identifier (Black, Indigenous, Latino, etc.) is preferred over BIPOC whenever the writer's actual referent is narrower. The 'catch-all' use erases the differences the term was created to surface.
“Use Black, Indigenous, People of Color (BIPOC) rather than People of Color (POC) if referring to a group that includes Black and/or Indigenous folks. Refer to individuals by their individual racial/ethnic/cultural/political identifier, rather than using BIPOC, whenever possible. Example, 'Natalia is a Latinx small business owner,' rather than, 'Natalia is a BIPOC small business owner.'”
NGC's rule matches Sierra Club's at the structural level — BIPOC over POC when Black or Indigenous people are in the group; specific identifier over BIPOC for individuals. The Natalia example is the cleanest articulation of the failure mode the rule guards against: a Latinx small business owner is not 'a BIPOC small business owner' as an identity label; BIPOC is a collective frame, not a personal descriptor.
“An acronym that stands for Black, Indigenous and people of color. The term is meant to unite all people of color while acknowledging that Black and Indigenous people face different and often more severe forms of racial oppression and cultural erasure as consequences of systemic white supremacy and colonialism. It is a noun and since it includes the word 'people' it would be redundant to say 'BIPOC people.' It is pronounced 'buy-pock' as opposed to saying each letter individually. BIPOC first came into use in the early 2010s but it became more prevalent in May 2020 during the protest movement against police brutality and institutional racism sparked by the May 25, 2020 killing of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. While BIPOC is commonly used by activists, it is not universally embraced. Some consider it redundant.”
DSG locates BIPOC historically (early-2010s origin, May 2020 inflection point with the murder of George Floyd) and flags both the construction rules ('BIPOC people' is redundant; the word is a single noun pronounced 'buy-pock') and the live debate — adoption is concentrated in activist usage and not universal. References both the NYT Garcia article and The BIPOC Project as further reading.
“A term referring to 'Black and/or Indigenous People of Color.' While 'POC' or People of Color is often used as well, BIPOC explicitly leads with Black and Indigenous identities, which helps to counter anti-Black racism and invisibilization of Native communities.”
RET's framing emphasizes the structural purpose — explicitly leading with Black and Indigenous identities counters two specific failure modes that POC alone doesn't: anti-Black racism and Native invisibilization. RET reads the term as a fronting choice, not a redundancy.
Context data
Origin of BIPOC
BIPOC first appeared in scattered usage in the early 2010s; its prevalence accelerated sharply in May 2020 during the protest movement following the killing of George Floyd.
The post-George-Floyd jump is the load-bearing adoption context. Most current style-guide entries on BIPOC were written in 2020–2021 in response to the term moving from activist usage into mainstream journalism.
View source → The BIPOC Project
An organization explicitly framing the term's purpose as solidarity-building 'to undo Native invisibility, anti-Blackness, dismantle white supremacy and advance racial justice.'
Closest thing to an institutional steward of the term. Cited by DSG. Useful when explaining the term's intended posture vs. its colloquial flattening into 'all non-white people.'
View source → Audience notes
- Journalism / news copy
- DSG-aligned guidance: spell out 'Black, Indigenous, and people of color' on first use; use BIPOC on subsequent reference. 'BIPOC people' is redundant — the P in BIPOC already means 'people.' Use as a noun ('BIPOC voters,' 'support for BIPOC entrepreneurs'), not as an individual descriptor.
- Individual identification
- Do not use BIPOC as a personal descriptor when a specific identifier exists. 'Natalia is BIPOC' flattens her Latinx identity into a collective frame; 'Natalia is a Latinx small business owner' is correct (NGC). The same logic applies to Black, Indigenous, Asian American, Pacific Islander, etc.
- Groups that include neither Black nor Indigenous people
- Use POC, not BIPOC. The 'BI' prefix names a specific structural distinction; using it for a group that doesn't include Black or Indigenous people empties the distinction.
- Non-US contexts
- BIPOC is a US-rooted term that names US structural racism specifically. It travels poorly to UK, EU, Latin American, or African contexts where racial categories and histories are constructed differently. Use local terminology or 'people of color' if a non-US frame is needed.
Synthesis
Every guide that addresses BIPOC tells the same nested story, even when the surface recommendation varies: the term names a real structural distinction, and overusing it erases that distinction.
The structural claim is consistent across all four sources: Black and Indigenous people in the US experience racism in a way that is qualitatively distinct from — and frequently more severe than — what other people of color experience. BIPOC names that distinction by fronting it. Sierra Club, NGC, DSG, and RET all agree on this framing. Where the prior ‘people of color’ umbrella treats all non-white experience as analytically interchangeable, BIPOC insists on the asymmetry.
The over-use failure mode is the live editorial concern. Three of four guides (Sierra Club, NGC, DSG) flag the same trap: writers reach for BIPOC as a polite catch-all for ‘non-white,’ which is exactly the move BIPOC was coined to make harder. The remedy is shared:
- Use a more specific identifier when one fits. “Latinx small business owner,” not “BIPOC small business owner” (NGC). “Black voters” or “Indigenous communities,” not “BIPOC voters” when those are the actual referents (Sierra Club).
- Reserve BIPOC for genuinely cross-cutting solidarity contexts where the structural Black-and-Indigenous-front-and-center framing is what you mean to invoke. “BIPOC-led coalitions,” “BIPOC mutual aid networks” — collective frames where the asymmetry is being deliberately named.
- Use BIPOC as a noun, not an individual descriptor. The P already means ‘people’ — ‘BIPOC people’ is redundant (DSG). BIPOC works as a group label, not as a personal identity term.
The Sierra Club position — “either term, PoC or BIPOC, is acceptable” — is the most permissive in the corpus, but the surrounding text still pushes hard toward specificity over the umbrella. There is no guide in the in-scope corpus that prefers BIPOC for individual identification or that treats it as fully interchangeable with POC.
RET reads the asymmetric framing as a feature, not a hazard — leading with B and I counters anti-Black racism and Native invisibilization specifically. That’s the most pro-BIPOC position in the corpus. It coexists with the Sierra Club / NGC / DSG “use with care” posture rather than contradicting it; both positions agree on what the term is for and what failure modes to avoid.
The cleanest one-line rule: be more specific whenever you can; reach for BIPOC when you specifically mean the cross-cutting solidarity frame, not as shorthand for ‘non-white.‘
Cross-references
- people of color (POC) — The umbrella BIPOC partly displaced. Still acceptable; differs in whether it fronts the Black-and-Indigenous structural distinction.
- Black — The specific identifier to use when ‘Black’ is what you mean.
- Indigenous — Same logic — use the specific identifier where it fits.
- minority — Older catch-all that Sierra Club and Race Forward both flag as moving toward inaccuracy and as reinforcing marginalization.
History note
BIPOC emerged from US activist usage in the early 2010s and remained relatively niche through the late 2010s. The May 2020 protests following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis pushed the term sharply into mainstream usage — Sandra E. Garcia’s June 17, 2020 New York Times piece, “Where Did BIPOC Come From?”, captured the moment when the term crossed the activist/mainstream threshold. The 2020–2021 wave of post-Floyd style-guide updates is when most current institutional positions on BIPOC were set. The ‘use BIPOC only where the cross-cutting frame fits; otherwise be specific’ guidance had stabilized across major progressive guides by mid-2021.
Related terms