Home / Glossary / Reservation
Reservation
Also written: reservation, reservations, Indian reservation
capitalization-rulesovereigntylegal-term
At a glance
Source-by-source
“DO NOT capitalize reservation, unless it's part of a specific reservation name …”
NGC distinguishes a reservation (a land base defined by the federal government) from a Native nation (a sovereign political entity) — the two are not interchangeable. Capitalization rule: lowercase 'reservation' as a generic term; capitalize only when it appears as part of a specific named reservation, or when an immediate back-reference makes the antecedent specific.
“Through treaties, Tribes ceded their traditional homelands and other properties and rights. The land Tribes reserved for themselves to continue living upon are called 'reservations' for a reason.”
Sierra Club reframes 'reservation' etymologically and politically: the land was reserved by Tribes for themselves through treaty negotiation, not granted to them by the federal government. The framing is a corrective against the common misreading of reservations as government-allocated land. Treaty rights, not government benevolence, are the source of Tribal land rights.
“The term 'rez' (meaning reservation) should never be used by the Sierra Club. … Instead, say 'on the Navajo Nation' or other specific place name.”
Sierra Club separates community-internal usage from outside use: 'rez' is acceptable among Tribal members but inappropriate when used by an outside organization. The recommended substitute is the specific place name (the Navajo Nation, etc.) — applying the same specificity rule that runs through Sierra Club's broader Tribal-coverage guidance.
“Indian Country is a legal term used in Title 18 of the U.S. Code. It broadly defines federal and tribal jurisdiction in crimes affecting American Indians on reservations. But it also has popular usage, describing reservations, lands held within tribal jurisdictions and areas with American Indian populations.”
NAJA situates reservations within a wider legal/cultural geography — 'Indian Country' is the umbrella legal term in U.S. federal code, and includes reservations along with other tribal-jurisdiction lands. NAJA does not separately treat 'reservation' as a style-guide entry; the term is used descriptively throughout the guide alongside 'tribal lands.'
“Indian reservations are areas of land reserved by the U.S. government as permanent tribal homelands. The United States established its reservation policy for American Indians in 1787. … More than 60 percent of American Indians live away from reservations.”
DSG's entry is descriptive rather than prescriptive — it locates the term historically (U.S. reservation policy established 1787), gives current scale (326 reservations, ~56 million acres), and flags that a majority of American Indians live off-reservation. The framing positions the reservation system as U.S. government policy rather than (as in Sierra Club's framing) treaty-reserved land.
“Indian reservations are recognized as what can be termed 'nations within.' Each has its own government and sovereign powers to make laws, tax, etc. and most also have their own tribal justice system, also based upon their inherent powers.”
RET's treatment of reservations frames them as 'nations within' — sovereign political units with their own governments, laws, taxation, and justice systems. The framing emphasizes that tribal sovereignty is inherent, not delegated by the U.S. government; treaties affirm rights that pre-exist them.
Synthesis
The reservation entry is less about whether to use the term and more about what framing the term carries. Two distinct framings appear in the corpus. The Sierra Club framing is etymological and political: a reservation is land that Tribes reserved for themselves through treaty negotiation, not land the federal government allocated to them. Any benefits flowing from that land are treaty rights, not federal benevolence. The DSG framing is descriptive and federal-policy oriented: reservations are areas the U.S. government “reserved as permanent tribal homelands,” with U.S. reservation policy dating to 1787, 326 reservations as of 2015, and more than 60% of American Indians living off-reservation. Both framings are defensible; they emphasize different facts. The Sierra Club framing is the one most often missed in non-Indigenous progressive writing and worth surfacing explicitly when it matters to the story.
NGC and RET both stress a separate point that often goes unstated: a reservation is not a Native nation. NGC’s definition is the cleanest: “A reservation refers to a Native nation’s current land base as defined by the federal government. A Native nation is a sovereign political entity.” RET reinforces the sovereignty point — reservations are “nations within,” with their own governments, laws, taxation, and justice systems, and tribal sovereignty is inherent rather than delegated. Conflating the two (treating “the reservation” and “the tribe” as synonyms) flattens the political distinction these guides are trying to preserve. NAJA situates reservations within “Indian Country,” the umbrella legal term in Title 18 of the U.S. Code, which covers reservations along with other tribal-jurisdiction lands.
Capitalization is straightforward and consistent: lowercase “reservation” as a generic term; capitalize when it appears as part of a specific named reservation, or in a back-reference whose antecedent is specific (NGC’s “Cheyenne River Reservation … the Reservation” example). On the slang form “rez,” Sierra Club is the only source in this entry to weigh in, and it is explicit: appropriate within Tribal communities, inappropriate as outsider language. The substitute is the specific place name.
Audience notes
- Land-defense and environmental coverage. Sierra Club’s etymological framing — reservations are treaty-reserved land, not government-granted land — is the framing most often missed in non-Indigenous environmental writing about pipelines, mining, or land returns. When the story turns on treaty rights, this distinction is load-bearing; “the government gave them this land” is a substantively different claim than “they kept this land through treaty.”
- Sovereignty framing. Don’t use “reservation” and “tribe” or “nation” interchangeably. The reservation is the land base; the nation is the sovereign political entity. Stories about tribal government, court decisions, or jurisdictional questions should name the nation; stories about land, housing, or local geography may correctly use reservation.
- The “rez” question. Don’t use “rez” or “on the rez” in writing by or for outside organizations. The term is acceptable in community-internal use and in direct quotation; outside that, the specific place name (the Navajo Nation, the Cheyenne River Reservation) is the cleaner substitute.
Related terms